Price Junel Fe Insurance

with questions.

There's that name, consisting of first name and surname, the one child every state has at its disposal through state documents, and it was on the birth certificate. With the advent of Internet, web2.0 and all the tools were a lot of socializing and then chose another name under which they now have a presence in the public network.

Now it happened over time that (from the perspective of Netzpseudonyms?) Name of state documents, the term "real name" was given. Wiesoweshalbwarum? To this question I have not really an answer. I know only the meaning that it is just the name on the personnel. But really that makes sense with the "real name" is not for me. Finally, my pseudonym is also clear to read around here everywhere. Imagine only once: "**** ****** and her life. " That would be a hopeless mess, if more than 3 people meet each other in the network. "Hey 4star-space-6Stern. Hab grad of 8Stern heard that 4star-underscore 3stars is tomorrow, too." Neeneenee.
But I'd best not be. An explanation or motivation for the creation of "real name" I can piece together, I am well. The word "pseudonym" includes in its meaning, that wants to keep his state of the corresponding human document name concealed. So, just as the asterisk all our passwords obscure as you type. If the password the characters as asterisks (or point) is covered, they will appear in plain text. There is the way to the "real name" is also not so far. But it remains unsatisfactory as a description yet somehow ...

not much different when it comes to my mind with the "Real name". Where this is resolved quickly. There are the usual distinction between virtual life and real life. What is the virtual driving his pseudonym or nickname, is the real life his real name.
My problem here: where is the Boundary between virtual and real life? When I blog, twitter, skype, etc., then the most real to me. Now I will not deny that the physical nature of the physical presence makes a difference in social interaction. Namely, making them definitely. involve mere possibility, facial expressions and gestures in their nuances in communication, has an eminent impact on the development of a conversation. But communication is via Bits'n'Bytes so unreal? No, just different. Real will remain as before. Finally, the hardware on which all this takes place, and even physically present.

Then we had there with the Civic. As an alternative for the name that we have left our parents, but it is also rather unsatisfactory. I have always from criticism from the camp of leftist thinking - the bourgeoisie and the state-citizen political concept and the impact on the desirability of the country.

We would then have three names ie: real name, real name, real name. All three are stupid. Alternative I can think of now is not from the Sugar Loaf. Remains the nagging's first words.